Posterior Lumbar Fusion: Choice of Approach and Adjunct Techniques

Charla R. Fischer J Am Acad Orthop Surg August 2014 vol. 22 no. 8

The choice among the many options of approach and adjunct techniques in planning a posterior lumbar fusion can be problematic. Debates remain as to whether solid fusion has an advantage over pseudarthrosis regarding long-term symptom deterioration and whether an instrumented or a noninstrumented approach will best serve clinically and/or cost effectively, particularly in elderly patients. Increased motion resulting in higher rates of nonunion and the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been studied in animal models and are presumed risk factors, despite the lack of clinical investigation. Smoking is a proven risk factor for pseudarthrosis in both animal models and level III clinical studies. Recent long-term studies and image/clinical assessment of lumbar fusions and pseudarthrosis show that, although imaging remains a key area of difficulty in assessment, including an instrumented approach and a well-selected biologic adjunct, as well as achieving a solid fusion, all carry important long-term clinical advantages in avoiding revision surgery for nonunion.

Puede ver también

Association of age with incidence and timing of recurrence after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation

Siccoli, A., Schröder, M.L. & Staartjes, V.E. Association of age with incidence and timing of …