Cost-effectiveness of manual therapy versus physiotherapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic neck pain: a randomised controlled trial

 

Cost-effectiveness of manual therapy versus physiotherapy in patients with sub-acute and chronic neck pain: a randomised controlled trial

J. M. van Dongen1 • R. Groeneweg1,2,3 • S. M. Rubinstein1 • J. E. Bosmans1 • R. A. B. Oostendorp2,4 • R. W. J. G. Ostelo1,5 • M. W. van Tulder1,5

Eur Spine J (2016) 25:2087–2096

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of manual therapy according to the Utrecht School (MTU) in comparison with physiotherapy (PT) in sub-acute and chronic non-specific neck pain patients from a societal perspective.

Methods: An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 52-week randomized controlled trial, in which 90 patients were randomized to the MTU group and 91 to the PT group. Clinical outcomes included perceived recovery (yes/no), functional status (continuous and yes/no), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs were measured from a societal perspective using self-reported questionnaires. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. To estimate statistical uncertainty, bootstrapping techniques were used.

Results: After 52 weeks, there were no significant between-group differences in clinical outcomes. During follow-up, intervention costs (b:€-32; 95 %CI: -54 to -10) and healthcare costs (b:€-126; 95 %CI: -235 to -32) were significantly lower in the MTU group than in the PT group, whereas unpaid productivity costs were significantly higher (b:€186; 95 %CI:19–557). Societal costs did not significantly differ between groups (b:€-96; 95 %CI:-1975–2022). For QALYs and functional status (yes/no), the maximum probability of MTU being costeffective in comparison with PT was low (B0.54). For perceived recovery (yes/no) and functional status (continuous), a large amount of money must be paid per additional unit of effect to reach a reasonable probability of costeffectiveness.

 

Texto disponible en:

http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/738/art%253A10.1007%252Fs00586-016-4526-0.pdf?originUrl=http%3A%2F%2Flink.springer.com%2Farticle%2F10.1007%2Fs00586-016-4526-0&token2=exp=1468348424~acl=%2Fstatic%2Fpdf%2F738%2Fart%25253A10.1007%25252Fs00586-016-4526-0.pdf%3ForiginUrl%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Flink.springer.com%252Farticle%252F10.1007%252Fs00586-016-4526-0*~hmac=d1075fcc42991f9e243bed3f96ea3bda21669be9dc68c7044908db4237c788ca

Check Also

Percutaneous cement augmentation in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) in the elderly: a systematic review

Última actualización 22/07/20 Sanli, I., van Kuijk, S.M.J., de Bie, R.A. et al. Percutaneous cement augmentation in …